Spoilers aplenty, of course...
1. First of all, I liked it a lot. Like most comic book fans, I've been waiting for this one for years (hell, decades), and I had pretty much assumed it was never going to really happen. To have it in theaters -- and to have it so close to the actual comic book -- is almost enough as it is. To have it actually be good (and yes, I thought it was pretty damn good) is a bonus, really.
2. I have no idea how someone with no previous exposure to the story will feel about it. I've probably read WATCHMEN more than any other work in my life (comics or otherwise), and I know that thing backward and forward. For me, sitting there in the theater, half the fun was seeing how certain beloved scenes would play out. As the movie went on (and on -- it's long, but I'm not complaining) I grew more and more amazed at just how much of the book Snyder and Co. managed to actually get into the movie. But it was complex, both plot and structure-wise. That's why I wonder if someone who didn't already know the story would understand the movie.
3. That opening credits sequence has been praised by virtually everyone, and for good reason. It sums up the offbeat history of this world with wit, charm and style, and throws in some great visual jokes along the way (Silhouette and the nurse re-enacting the famous VJ Day photo, the Silk Spectre's retirement dinner mimicking the Last Supper).
4. I also like the way the movie starts at the very beginning, with the corporate logos simple black on white, pulling out -- way out -- to the smiley face badge. Nice touch, and the later shot of the badge in the bloody gutter pulling way back was a dead-on recreation of the cover and page one of the first issue.

5. Jackie Earle Haley made a pretty great Rorschach, didn't he? I was looking forward to the scene of his arrest outside Moloch's apartment, partly because it was such a powerful moment in the comic, with him screaming "Give me back my face!" It did not disappoint onscreen. Same with his telling the prisoners "You're locked up in here with me" and the entire jail cell sequence. (Except for the change of the line from "Your fingers. My perspective" to "Your fingers. My pleasure." That sounds goofy, and it doesn't even really make sense.)

5. Jackie Earle Haley made a pretty great Rorschach, didn't he? I was looking forward to the scene of his arrest outside Moloch's apartment, partly because it was such a powerful moment in the comic, with him screaming "Give me back my face!" It did not disappoint onscreen. Same with his telling the prisoners "You're locked up in here with me" and the entire jail cell sequence. (Except for the change of the line from "Your fingers. My perspective" to "Your fingers. My pleasure." That sounds goofy, and it doesn't even really make sense.)
6. The follow-up to that scene, with Rorschach going into the bathroom (to kill Big Figure) while Dan and Laurie wait outside actually worked better than in the comic. That lack of dialogue (replaced by awkward shuffling of feer) and the swinging door showing flashes of what was happening inside -- something you couldn't do as well in a comic -- was staged perfectly. That being said, Dan and Laurie's fights in the prison hallways were way overdone. They seemed like heroes -- hell, superheroes -- at the top of their game, not former heroes gone to seed. Same for the fight in the alley earlier in the film. In the comic, there are fewer punks, and it works a lot better. (Nice to see they were Knottops, though.)

8. I expected to see Nixon (can't libel the dead, after all) and Kissinger, but seeing Lee Iacocca -- and seeing him (a) as part of a dark cabal trying to pressure Ozymandias and (b) seeing him get shot in the head -- was mighty surprising. Not that I mind (it's a movie, after all), but what's the legality of that sort of thing? (Speak of Ozymandias, you know who would've been perfect as him? A young Robert Redford.)

9. Man, Carla Gugino was born to wear that Silk Spectre outfit, wasn't she? Of all the characters in the movie, she probably looked the least like her Dave Gibbons-drawn inspiration, but who's going to complain?
10. Seeing Nite Owl's garage, with its layers of dust and pieces of superhero debris all over the place was a kick. I especially liked how everytime Archie took off, stuff got blown all over the workshop.

11. I've never seen Jeffrey Dean Morgan or that stupid doctor show he plays a ghost on, but he made a great Comedian. Nasty, funny and lost, sometimes all at once.
12. The Dr. Manhattan elements were handled especially well, and I was glad to see the fractured flashback structure maintained for his origin sequence. Some shots -- like Jenny Slater staring up at the reborn Manhattan -- were right out of the book. And the condensing of his outburst on the talk show to lead to the jump to Mars was a good story choice. (Glad to see they kept the smiley face on Mars, too.)
13. There was some nerdish online debate about the ending, and the lack of the giant squid. I actually thought the movie ending worked as well as the original, tying Dr. Manhattan into the climax more directly. Adding the squid might've been one weird element too many in a movie already full of them. (And the movie does give a nod to the squid -- as glimpsed in an early scene, Veidt's project has the acronym S.Q.U.I.D.)
That's it for now -- though I might post more in a bit. This is one movie I keep replaying in my head.
10 comments:
I really enjoyed the music choices in the film. The score sounded like something from the mid 80s and it worked really well, I thought. And using Philip Glass' Koyaanisqatsi music for the Dr. Manhattan origin sequence was genius.
One thing I thought was a little odd was how they handled Dan and Laurie on the owlship after the fire. Their scene on the couch earlier was nice and restrained, I thought, and then there was the much longer than expected love scene on the owlship. It just was more and longer than I expected.
Also, Laurie threw up much less than expected.
Mack -- I'd agree the second sex scene was a little silly, and probably should've been much more understated. Love scenes in movies are tough -- do 'em wrong, and they just look goofy.
Speaking of music, did you notice the instrumental version of "Everybody wants to Rule the World" during Ozymandias' scene? Nice.
I missed that, but I was never much of a Tears For Fears fan. Being a Philip Glass fan made me giddy when his music came on.
And I agree that how Dr. Manhattan's power was integrated into the revised ending was better than expected. I was expecting something that made much less sense.
I find it interesting that the scenes and elements in the film elicited such strongy good and ill feelings from people.
I haven't seen it yet. I really don't want to see it either, but I know that many "civilians" I know will ask about it, so I need to speak from an informed POV.
Now that you've run your geek flag up the pole, I salute it.
The movie was just way better than I would have dared to hope it would be. As you mentioned, I loved how many times they matched scenes with the book - the scene running from sidewalk back up to the Comedian's window, the pause at the statue's face before the funeral, etc.
I agree that opening montage really introduced the world well.
The attacker who killed the Comedian moved so fluidly that at first I thought it was at least partially a CGI figure fighting him. The guy who played the comedian looked to me so much like Robert Downey Jr. that I wonder if he was cast because of the likeness - although as you said, he was a great Comedian.
Redford would have been a very good Ozymandias - the guy they picked lacked some of the charisma that he has in the comic.
Hard to believe that Rorschach was Kelly from "Bad News Bears" - maybe Farkus from "Christmas Story" needs a shot at a major antihero role.
And Will - you were absolutely right about the first view of the Antarctic base - I wonder if someone pulled a "Spinal Tap" and they built the set using inches instead of feet?
As far as the giant squid...really, that was such an elaborate, over-the-top mechanism, that I don't really miss it (kinda like not seeing Tom Bombadil in "Lord of the Rings.")
Making it look like Dr. Manhattan attacked earth seems to me like a much simpler, more logical, more Occam's Razor kind of decision - more like something Ozymandias would do.
Anyway, I was thrilled with the movie, and loved your reviews.
Dave
I pretty much agreed with your thoughts in my own blog post. It's better than I hoped it would be, but still a bit flawed. The ultra-violence probably jarred me the most as a sop to the "Dawn of the Dead" fans.
Re : your point about Dan and Laurie fighting too well, I think the film deliberately fudged the issue of whether they, (and other cast members) were super powered or not. I thought this was one of the smarter decisions of the film since it made it more fun to watch them in action without invalidating what makes Dr Manhattan the only world changing hero.
That said, I think the book will far outlast it; I think a good comparison is the adaption of Catch 22, another story that was too complex to transfer directly into a film.
Have not seen it yet, but I think Jude Law would have been a better choice for Ozymandias.
Hi, Will!
We will have to have speaks, mein freund...
I actively disliked about 80% of the choices our young Mr. Snyder made, and wound up not liking the flick.
As you've already said, it'd be fascinating to truly know how this movie plays for someone who hadn't been immersed in the comic.
Either way, it's a great discussion starter for those of us interested in adapting existing material to film..what works, what don't, and WHY?
Autopsies can be fun.
I'm not sure what to really think about Watchmen. I know so much about it, that it's easy for me to fill in things that could not fit into the limited time frame of the film. The comic is more amazing each time I read it. As I mentioned once, i bought the graphic novel again, in the San Fran airport, on the way home from WonderCon so I could re read it again and I was amazed at what I was digesting for the first time. I wanted it to be longer. My bladder, did not. I loved how things looked and characters looked as if Dave had drawn them. I'm not sure how much of a story there is under everything in the film. Only Dr,.Manhattan has a real character arc...i thought Billy Crudup was very good as that character. My confusion was- while i suspend my disbelief just by walking in an accepting everything in the movie on face value, I thought the non- superhero characters (all of the heroes) were too super. it's been established that they all were just regular guys except for Manhattan. But then everyone can dish ouut and take a horrible amount of abuse. Like the head through the granite countertop?
Okay, I'm getting my geek on.
Anyone who wants to yak about this with me next week. I'm going to Club Lago on Thursday night! I cain't type all that I wants to say!
Post a Comment